翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Constituency WR-09
・ Constituency WR-10
・ Constituency WR-11
・ Constituency WR-12
・ Constituency WR-13
・ Constituency WR-14
・ Constituency WR-15
・ Constituency WR-16
・ Constituency WR-17
・ Constituency WR-18
・ Constituency WR-19
・ Constituency WR-20
・ Constituency WR-21
・ Constituency WR-22
・ Constituent
Constituent (linguistics)
・ Constituent assembly
・ Constituent Assembly (disambiguation)
・ Constituent Assembly (Peru)
・ Constituent Assembly (Philippines)
・ Constituent Assembly of Bangladesh
・ Constituent Assembly of Colombia
・ Constituent Assembly of Georgia
・ Constituent Assembly of India
・ Constituent Assembly of Italy
・ Constituent assembly of Jammu and Kashmir
・ Constituent Assembly of Libya
・ Constituent Assembly of Lithuania
・ Constituent Assembly of Luxembourg
・ Constituent Assembly of Pakistan


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Constituent (linguistics) : ウィキペディア英語版
Constituent (linguistics)
In syntactic analysis, a constituent is a word or a group of words which function(s) as a single unit within a hierarchical structure. The analysis of constituent structure is associated mainly with phrase structure grammars, although dependency grammars also allow sentence structure to be broken down into constituent parts. The constituent structure of sentences is identified using ''constituency tests''. These tests manipulate some portion of a sentence and based on the result, clues are delivered about the immediate constituent structure of the sentence. Many constituents are phrases. A phrase is a sequence of two or more words built around a head lexical item and working as a unit within a sentence. A word sequence is shown to be a phrase/constituent if it exhibits one or more of the behaviors discussed below.〔Tests for constituent structure can be found in most textbooks on syntax. See for instance Sobin (2011: 30).〕
==Constituency tests==
Constituency tests are diagnostics employed to identify the constituent structure of sentences.〔See for instance Burton-Roberts (1997:7–23) and Carnie (2002:51-53).〕 There are numerous constituency tests applied to English sentences, many of which are listed here: 1. topicalization (fronting), 2. clefting, 3. pseudoclefting, 4. pro-form substitution (replacement), 5. answer ellipsis (question test), 6. passivization, 7. omission (deletion), 8. coordination, etc. These tests are rough-and-ready tools which grammarians employ to reveal clues about syntactic structure. A word of caution is warranted when employing these tests, since they often deliver contradictory results. Some syntacticians even arrange the tests on a scale of reliability, with less-reliable tests treated as useful to confirm constituency though not sufficient on their own.〔(April 22, 2006 Language Log posting ) by Eric Bakovic of University of California, San Diego〕 Failing to pass a single test does not mean that the unit is not a constituent, and conversely, passing a single test does not mean necessarily that the unit is a constituent. It is best to apply as many tests as possible to a given unit in order to prove or to rule out its status as a constituent.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Constituent (linguistics)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.